As an installer of two different underpinning systems, I
have firsthand knowledge of both Thermal set plastic coated and galvanized
piers. I have been a part of the debate
between the two protective coating systems for many years. I have seen
firsthand how the products react over time in the soil.
First let’s discuss the threaded rods that hold the brackets
in place. These threaded rods hold the building up and are put under a tensile
load to do so. These threaded rods are very close to the surface and therefore
are exposed to high amounts of both water and oxygen making them more
susceptible to corrosion at that location. If these threaded rods fail in
tension, then the building settles. Below is a picture of threaded rods and the
corrosion that takes place in open air conditions. We can all agree that
embedded in soils that are wetted on a regular basis the corrosion will be much
more accelerated than in open air conditions.
The alternative is to use galvanized coil rods that will
provide some protection from oxidization such as these pictured.
Below is pictured are typical foundation brackets with Thermal Set epoxy coating after it has been
installed in the ground for about a year and a half. Notice all of the peeling
that is taking place. Again this bracket is located very near the surface and
therefore exposed to high amounts of water and oxygen.
The first assumption that only the tip of the epoxy coated
system would be exposed is not true. Much of the entire shaft epoxy coating is
removed during the installation process. I have withdrawn many powder coated
piles that I installed, and most of the shaft was bare. Furthermore when small
amounts of epoxy coating are removed it works very similar to epoxy coating on
rebar in that it focuses the electrochemical oxidization process entirely on a
very small area exacerbating the oxidization there.
With galvanized products a small scratch does not have this
effect as the galvanization is nobler than the steel, protecting even the small
scratch area from oxidization. The added advantage is that zinc anodes can be
added to the pile and replaced on a regular basis as needed to complement a
galvanized product. This also extends to providing protection to the coil rods
as anything in connection with the galvanized products is protected.
One bit of misinformation propagated by the users of Thermal
Set epoxy coated products is that the galvanized products leach deadly zinc
products into the soil. This is not true, as the actual product that is leaked
into the soil is zinc oxide. This is the same zinc oxide that we take as a vitamin
supplement. Hardly deadly.
One last bit of advantage is that the hot dipped galvanized
products actually gain strength from this process and provide more overall
strength because of it.
Feel free to weigh in with your opinion in the comments
portion.
Hi Bob,
ReplyDeleteI appreciated this article on corrosion. It is all “correct” to my past humble experiences.
The one point that I can add that supports your facts about galvanised protection is this: the galvanising Specification for heavy items (we have our own Spec in South Africa that is based on the IEC Spec, I’m sure the US Spec (ASTM A123 & ASTM A153) is the same) does not call for the component to be 100% covered. It allows for the equivalent of 6mm (1/4”) diameter areas to be fully exposed, and still to be considered compliant.
I’ve had an interest in corrosion protection over the past 30 years of my involvement in the high voltage electrical industry. I’m not an expert, but I enjoy the subject. I have got a number of “test” samples around SA, they all support the theory.
Electrical power lines have the potential of significantly higher levels of corrosion activities. I know a site about 25km (20 miles) from the west coast of Africa, where it will take about 2 years for that environment to completely erode off a ¾”, heavy galvanised, stay rod at slightly below ground level. Obviously that is far from the norm but it does give an accelerated indication of what will eventually take place. It would be interesting to observe the difference between galvanised and other “corrosion protection” coatings.
Cheers,
Phillip.
Interesting perspective Phillip. it is great to get comments from other parts of the world on these subjects. I would agree that connection to electrical infrastructure can accelerate the galvanic currents. in those cases I think it would be prudent to have a regular maintenance program replacing embedded anodes to keep ahead of the galvanic corrosion.
ReplyDelete